N-acetilcysteine prevents the <i>A</i>. <i>simplex</i> CE-induced TEER decrease. by Noelia Carballeda-Sangiao (2889611)

NN analysis to assign the importance of variables. by Sulmaz Ghahramani (3387635)

Differences in experience with IT across groups based on awareness of threats. by Simon Vrhovec (11714748)

Differences in age across groups based on awareness of threats. by Simon Vrhovec (11714748)

JNJ26993135 + BML-111 decreases permeability and enhances ZO-1 and claudin-1 induced by PAF but does not change TEER. by Kameljit K. Kalsi (16496511)

Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6). by Shirko Marcel Shokr (19173337)

“…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm²; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm²; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm²; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm²; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”

Differences in experience with information security across groups based on awareness of threats. by Simon Vrhovec (11714748)

Steps taken to mitigate threats to trustworthiness. by Aimee Hairon (20390367)

Correlation and significance. by Amer Hamad Issa Abukhalaf (22031327)

“…Across all regression models, neither threat possibility nor threat severity showed statistically significant associations (p > 0.01) with preparedness intentions. …”

Transepithelial resistance of NHBE decreases significantly after PAA exposure. by Ellie S. Burns (21246537)

Differences in awareness of threats across genders. by Simon Vrhovec (11714748)

Mean values and 95% confidence intervals for recovery time, Average NN Interval (AVNN); Standard Deviation of NN Intervals (SDNN), Low Frequency/ High Frequency Ratio (LF/HF); and... by Robert Trybulski (10998702)

Conservation category of each sampling area based on species scores and threat scores. by Brian M. Myers (19825736)

Variance Significance Factor (VSF). by Amer Hamad Issa Abukhalaf (22031327)

“…Across all regression models, neither threat possibility nor threat severity showed statistically significant associations (p > 0.01) with preparedness intentions. …”

Possible threats, their descriptions and mitigation using our proposed scheme. by Iqra Ilyas (19996005)

Major threats—characterized by the highest level of agreement between stakeholder groups—that affect the most significant receivers identified by all stakeholder groups. by Tarsila Seara (8934920)

Comparison of the threat reaction with vs. without pairing. by Zineb Hayatou (21492065)

“…<b>(C)</b> Top: difference between the horizontal eye movements in response to synchronous pairing of the artificial limb, versus no-pairing. Blue sections: significant differences (Bootstrap-based test <i>p</i> < 0.05). …”

Positional cloning of <i>qNN1</i> on chromosome 16. by Xinxin Li (281237)

GXM decreases the trans-endothelial electrical resistance (TEER) and transmigration of <i>C</i>. <i>neoformans</i> through HBECs in a blood brain barrier (BBB) model. by Hiu Ham Lee (15374677)

Differences in awareness of threats across organizational role types. by Simon Vrhovec (11714748)