Search alternatives:
significant treatment » significant investment (Expand Search), significant enrichment (Expand Search), significant impairment (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
treatment decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), treatments decreased (Expand Search), treatment increases (Expand Search)
significant treatment » significant investment (Expand Search), significant enrichment (Expand Search), significant impairment (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
treatment decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), treatments decreased (Expand Search), treatment increases (Expand Search)
-
1761
-
1762
-
1763
-
1764
-
1765
The hourly temperatures in the phytotron.
Published 2025“…After 10 days of exposure to LTS, the pollen viability decreased most significantly at the heading stage by 44.67%, followed by the booting and the tillering stages. …”
-
1766
-
1767
-
1768
rTsSPc interacted with PGAM5 and increased its protein expression in Caco-2 cells.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1769
Mean scores, standard deviations, and significance on key measures and subscales by gender group.
Published 2025Subjects: -
1770
-
1771
-
1772
-
1773
Flow chart of the literature search.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1774
Funnel plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1775
Network plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1776
Network plot for scar thickness.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1777
Funnel plot for VSS score.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1778
Characteristics of the included trials (n = 17).
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1779
Risk of bias graph.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”
-
1780
Network plot for VAS score.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>A total of 17 studies and 1,013 participants were included in this analysis. The treatment ranking revealed that massage therapy demonstrated the most significant efficacy in reducing Vancouver Scar Scale score (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.0%), CO<sub>2</sub> laser therapy exhibited the highest efficacy in decreasing scar thickness (SUCRA = 96.8%), and extracorporeal shock wave therapy + routine treatment showed the most significant efficacy in reducing Visual Analogue Scale score (SUCRA = 58.6%).…”