Search alternatives:
significant units » significant anti (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant insights (Expand Search)
units decrease » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
significant units » significant anti (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant insights (Expand Search)
units decrease » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. (<b>B)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on day 22. …”
-
5
-
6
SAR distribution in the cerebrum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
SAR distribution in the cerebellum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
8
SAR distribution in the brainstem comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
SAR distribution in the skull comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
SAR distribution in the scalp comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
The effect of HA digestion and HA replenishment alone or with CS on barrier function measured by TEER.
Published 2025“…PS decreased TEER. (C) Different treatments (treatment groups n = 8)with HA and/or CS did not affect TEER recovery after PS treatment, full recovery was seen in all groups after 24 hours. …”
-
12
-
13
-
14
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
15
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
16
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
17
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
18
Sample scenario description.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
19
AMCEs – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
20
Methodological flowchart.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”