Search alternatives:
significant units » significant anti (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant insights (Expand Search)
units decrease » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
significant units » significant anti (Expand Search), significant bias (Expand Search), significant insights (Expand Search)
units decrease » units increased (Expand Search), unit increase (Expand Search), visits decreased (Expand Search)
gap decrease » a decrease (Expand Search), gain decreased (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search)
we decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), nn decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Overview of the WeARTolerance program.
Published 2024“…<div><p>The stigma surrounding mental health remains a significant barrier to help-seeking and well-being in youth populations. …”
-
8
SAR distribution in the cerebrum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
SAR distribution in the cerebellum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
SAR distribution in the brainstem comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
SAR distribution in the skull comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
12
SAR distribution in the scalp comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
Significantly Enriched Pathways.
Published 2025“…By comparing samples from NAFLD patients and healthy controls, we identified 1,770 significant DEGs, with 1,073 being upregulated and 697 downregulated. …”
-
16
-
17
Preference for the EIA – conjoint results.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
18
Marginal means – Pooled across scenarios.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
19
Sample attribute table.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”
-
20
Subgroup analysis – Political affiliation.
Published 2025“…A randomized conjoint experiment and a follow-up choice experiment revealed that support for the EIAs decreased sharply as their accuracy gap grew, although impact parity was prioritized more when ETAs produced large outcome discrepancies. …”