Showing 1 - 20 results of 75,072 for search '(( significant urine based ) OR ( significant ((gap decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.02s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

    Genes significantly affected by deletion of <i>ryfA</i>. by Hicham Bessaiah (6840980)

    Published 2021
    “…Genes upregulated (yellow rectangles) and downregulated (blue rectangles) by at least 1.7-fold were considered significant with P < 0.05. Dark blue is greater or equal to (≥) a 3-fold decrease. …”
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7

    The variables that significantly predicted litter clump weight in shelter cats. by Allison Andrukonis (11846404)

    Published 2025
    “…C) Fewer days in the study predicted greater urine output (p = .034). The black line represents the line of best fit based on the reduced model with marginal means. …”
  8. 8

    Regenerating axons are increased by ATRA and decreased by clodronate. by Valeria De La Rosa-Reyes (6658613)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>(A—E) Confocal images of immunohistochemical staining of growing axons with anti-GAP43 antibody (green), in longitudinal sections of the optic nerve at 2 weeks after axotomy. …”
  9. 9

    Overexpression of Gαq decreases cell number and cell size. by Dharsan K. Soundarrajan (11632145)

    Published 2021
    “…Overexpression of Gαq in the pouch results in a decrease in total wing area, cell number and cell size. 10 samples were analyzed per condition. …”
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    Syndecan ectodomain fragments decrease endothelial resistance via rho kinase. by Melanie Jannaway (6703577)

    Published 2019
    “…In the presence of RWJ56110, rhS3ED fragments mediated a significant decrease in TER response (n = 3, p<0.0001). …”
  17. 17

    NgR1 KO mice exhibited an increase in excitatory synapses and a decrease in inhibitory synapses, indicating an imbalance of synaptic transmission. by Jinwei Zhang (462455)

    Published 2025
    “…The inhibitory synaptic density of NgR1 mice showed a significant decrease when compared to WT mice (***P <  0.001). …”
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20