Showing 61 - 80 results of 121,376 for search '(( significant use based ) OR ( significant ((spatial decrease) OR (small decrease)) ))', query time: 2.03s Refine Results
  1. 61
  2. 62
  3. 63
  4. 64
  5. 65
  6. 66
  7. 67
  8. 68
  9. 69
  10. 70
  11. 71
  12. 72

    Spatial models. by Qian Chen (18883)

    Published 2023
    Subjects:
  13. 73
  14. 74

    Residual test results based on FSAC model. by Jinxian Tang (15460795)

    Published 2023
    “…According to the findings of the empirical analysis of the Fenwei Plain, the <i>SO</i><sub>2</sub> concentration has significant seasonal characteristics and has decreased year over year for three years in a row. …”
  15. 75
  16. 76
  17. 77
  18. 78
  19. 79

    Spatial Dubin panel model estimation results. by Xiaoyu Wan (644814)

    Published 2024
    “…It is found that: (1) the scale and vitality of China’s digital technology innovation have increased significantly, and there are obvious spatial differentiation characteristics, and the innovation level of "eastern coastal—central and western interior" is decreasing, forming a cluster distribution pattern in the Yangtze River Delta region, Beijing, Guangdong, and other places, and the degree of agglomeration is decreasing. (2) The overall regional differences in China’s digital technology innovation are large, the differences between the East and the West dominate the interregional differences, and the net differences between regions are the main factors leading to regional differences. (3) There is a significant positive spatial correlation between the scale and vitality of digital technology innovation, which has a significant spatial spillover effect. (4) The results confirm that the level of economic development, digital access, financial scientific and technological support, technology market development level, and R&D intensity have a significant positive impact on the scale and vitality of digital technology innovation; The investment in scientific and technological talents has a significant positive impact on the scale of digital technology innovation, but has no significant impact on the vitality of digital technology innovation.…”
  20. 80