Search alternatives:
portion decrease » point decrease (Expand Search)
significant use » significant cause (Expand Search), significant i.e (Expand Search), significantly used (Expand Search)
use increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
portion decrease » point decrease (Expand Search)
significant use » significant cause (Expand Search), significant i.e (Expand Search), significantly used (Expand Search)
use increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
-
24
-
25
Bar graph showing proportion of NADCs.
Published 2025“…The risk of ADCs increased from stage 2 (OR: 0.46, p-value: 0.03; 95% CI: 0.23–0.91) to stage 3 (OR: 1.13; p-value: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.65–1.97) but this was not statistically significant. …”
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
-
33
-
34
-
35
-
36
Proportions and comparative mortality for sub-populations of septic (qSOFA≥2) patients, 2010–2019.
Published 2022Subjects: -
37
Proportions and comparative mortality for sub-populations of septic (qSOFA≥1) patients, 2010–2019.
Published 2022Subjects: -
38
-
39
Number of deer bows and proportion of deer showing aggressive behaviour in 2016–2017 and 2020–2021.
Published 2023Subjects: -
40