Search alternatives:
significant use » significant cause (Expand Search), significant i.e (Expand Search), significantly used (Expand Search)
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
use increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
significant use » significant cause (Expand Search), significant i.e (Expand Search), significantly used (Expand Search)
significant all » significant anti (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant _ (Expand Search)
use increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
all decrease » small decrease (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search), fold decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Average purchase costs of 3GCs and all oral antimicrobials per 100 patient-days from Phases 1–4.
Published 2023Subjects: -
5
All-variable XGBoost model on the <i>significant illness</i> binary using the all-owner dataset.
Published 2024“…<p>(a) Receiver operating characteristic curve of a prediction model containing all variables (owner, animal and healthcare). This shows the increasing true positive and false positive rates, with decrease of the threshold probability for prediction of <i>significant illness</i>. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.
Published 2023“…<p>Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.…”
-
13
Reduced (owner-animal metadata) XGBoost model on the <i>significant illness</i> binary using the all-owner dataset.
Published 2024“…<p>(a) Receiver operating characteristic curve of a reduced prediction model only containing owner and animal variables. This shows the increasing true positive and false positive rates, with decrease of the threshold probability for prediction of <i>significant illness</i>. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
18
-
19
-
20