Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant values » significant value (Expand Search), significant advances (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
values based » value based (Expand Search), values used (Expand Search), values ranged (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
significant values » significant value (Expand Search), significant advances (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
values based » value based (Expand Search), values used (Expand Search), values ranged (Expand Search)
-
61
Top 20 genes with significantly decreased abundance in Aco<sup>R</sup> cells.
Published 2021Subjects: -
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
Maximum IFN concentrations are decreased in severe patients.
Published 2025“…Statistical differences in maximal IFN values between groups are marked by a level of significance (*) estimated based on p-values above the box plots (*, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.005; ***, p < 0.0005; ****, p < 5e-5). …”
-
70
-
71
-
72
-
73
Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.
Published 2023“…<p>Concentration of RebA and Steviol showed increased significantly, whereas stevioside showed significant decrease in all the transgenic lines.…”
-
74
-
75
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
Published 2025“…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …”
-
76
Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).
Published 2025“…<p>Summary of the effect of MPDD on SDLP across all participants, and also participants categorized by driving styles (“NS” (no significant), “+” (significant increase), and “-” (significant decrease)).…”
-
77
-
78
Statistically significant union pathways refer to the miRNAs with a decreased expression on day 5.
Published 2023“…<p>Statistically significant union pathways refer to the miRNAs with a decreased expression on day 5.…”
-
79
-
80