Search alternatives:
significant values » significant value (Expand Search), significant advances (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
values increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant values » significant value (Expand Search), significant advances (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
values increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
changes decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
largest decrease » largest decreases (Expand Search), larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
161
-
162
-
163
-
164
Correlations of Lnc THRIL and MiR 125b with study parameters among CD patients.
Published 2022Subjects: -
165
-
166
-
167
-
168
-
169
-
170
-
171
-
172
-
173
-
174
-
175
-
176
Moran’s I value, Z value and P value of CCD-GFEE.
Published 2025“…Within them, the CCD of Chengdu is the highest, Chongqing has achieved the largest stage leap. (4) The global Moran’s I consistently remained positive and exhibited a tendency of initially rising and subsequently falling, indicating that the spatial aggregation effect of CCD-GFEE first increased and then decreased. (5) The CCD-GFEE driving factors are examined using the spatial econometric model, and it has been observed that the impact of population size and government intervention on CCD-GFEE is negative, while the impact of industrial structure, technological progress and economic level on the coupling and coordination of CCD-GFEE is positive. …”
-
177
Inflamation indicator values in each group.
Published 2024“…Conversely, no significant decrease in the above inflammatory indices and no significant increase in HO-1 expression were observed in rats in the blocking group (P > 0.05).…”
-
178
Biochemical indicator values in each group.
Published 2024“…Conversely, no significant decrease in the above inflammatory indices and no significant increase in HO-1 expression were observed in rats in the blocking group (P > 0.05).…”
-
179
-
180