Search alternatives:
significant variations » significant associations (Expand Search), significant implications (Expand Search), significant correlations (Expand Search)
variations decrease » variation increases (Expand Search)
significant values » significant value (Expand Search), significant advances (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
values increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
significant variations » significant associations (Expand Search), significant implications (Expand Search), significant correlations (Expand Search)
variations decrease » variation increases (Expand Search)
significant values » significant value (Expand Search), significant advances (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search)
values increased » cases increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search), rate increased (Expand Search)
-
21
-
22
-
23
Percentage of significant variation trend of NDVI in the nine divisions in Northeast China.
Published 2022Subjects: -
24
-
25
-
26
-
27
-
28
-
29
-
30
-
31
-
32
Variation of heat flow with wall temperature.
Published 2025“…With spray hole diameters ranging from 0.4 mm to 0.7 mm, the fractal dimensions of all droplet flames appear at around 2.6 seconds, but the values of <i>D</i><sub><i>max</i></sub> vary significantly. …”
-
33
GO analysis of stage-salient genes in the order of decreasing significance (i.e, increasing p–value).
Published 2022“…<p>GO analysis of stage-salient genes in the order of decreasing significance (i.e, increasing p–value).</p>…”
-
34
-
35
-
36
-
37
-
38
-
39
Loss variation curves of three models.
Published 2024“…The results show that in the comparison experiments, the improved micro-miniature fourth-generation real-time target detection algorithm outperforms the traditional target detection algorithm, with the loss value decreasing to 1.54. Its average accuracy in multi-target recognition is dramatically increased to 86.74%, which is 22.36% higher than the original model, and the ping-pong ball recognition experiments show that it has an excellent accuracy in various lighting conditions, especially in low light, with an average accuracy of 89.12%. …”
-
40