Showing 1 - 20 results of 89,238 for search '(( significant variable regression ) OR ( significant ((main decrease) OR (a decrease)) ))', query time: 1.71s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2

    The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified. by Krzysztof Kochanek (835532)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.…”
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8

    Leptin receptor deficiency caused decrease in cortical bone mainly in female mice. by Devorah M. Natelson (8807576)

    Published 2020
    “…Post Hoc testing indicated that increased Ct.BS/BV was only significant in male mice on WD p < 0.05. Ct.Ar/Tt.A<i>r</i> = cortical area fraction; Ct.Ar = cortical area; Ct.Th = cortical thickness; Tt.Ar = total area; Ct. …”
  9. 9
  10. 10

    Meta-regressions of significant factors influencing heart rate variability in untreated hypothyroid patients (exhaustive metaregressions are presented in S5 Fig). by Valentin Brusseau (12769704)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>Meta-regressions of significant factors influencing heart rate variability in untreated hypothyroid patients (exhaustive metaregressions are presented in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0269277#pone.0269277.s006" target="_blank">S5 Fig</a>).…”
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

    A multivariable logistic regression model including all variables. by Unzela Ghulam (14312251)

    Published 2022
    “…Multivariable logistic regression: forward model, for only significant variables in the full analysis, is shown in the bottom half.…”
  17. 17
  18. 18

    Multivariate logistic regression of significant variables. by Daniella Justesen (22170253)

    Published 2025
    “…<p>Multivariate logistic regression of significant variables.</p>…”
  19. 19
  20. 20

    Instrumental variable regression results. by Pu Miao (12886949)

    Published 2025
    “…During this lag period, the effect on the number of patent declines by 8.475% to 28.283%, while the impact on the number of citations of patents decreases by 55.696% to 73.214%. (4) The significant promotional effect of science and technology talent policies is most pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises and those with high R&D investment, but such policies do not have a notable impact on state-owned enterprises or those with low R&D investment. …”