Search alternatives:
significant work » significant co (Expand Search), significantly worse (Expand Search), significant group (Expand Search)
work increases » fold increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
rise decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
significant work » significant co (Expand Search), significantly worse (Expand Search), significant group (Expand Search)
work increases » fold increases (Expand Search), marked increases (Expand Search)
sizes decrease » size increase (Expand Search), scores decreased (Expand Search)
rise decrease » rate decreased (Expand Search), use decreased (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Sediment particle size curve.
Published 2024“…The observed data from the experiment were analysed and calculated using range analysis, variance analysis, and main-effect multiple comparison analysis, then the optimal working conditions were determined. The results of the study showed that fertilizer concentration and sediment content had a significant effect on the average relative flow, and the degree of influence of each influencing factor on the average relative flow was as follows: sediment content > fertilizer concentration > working pressure. …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Transition probabilities and class sizes for three-step LTA model (N = 432).
Published 2025Subjects: -
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Graph of wear volume variation for test groups with different particle sizes at two concentrations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
17
-
18
Validation of primary screen hits reveals compounds that recapitulate increased spheroid size (swell) or decreased MUC5AC in the lumen.
Published 2023“…Compound 206 (1μM) significantly increased spheroid size relative to DMSO + CSE 3% control bronchospheres. …”
-
19
-
20