Search alternatives:
significant yolo » significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search)
yolo increased » fold increased (Expand Search), yield increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant yolo » significant co (Expand Search), significant body (Expand Search), significant all (Expand Search)
yolo increased » fold increased (Expand Search), yield increased (Expand Search), also increased (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the increase in the integrity and decrease in the permeability of epithelial barrier injury induced by LPS in Caco2 monolayers.
Published 2024“…<p>(<b>A)</b> Y-27632 collaborated with BA to attenuate the effect of LPS on TEER in Caco2 cells on days 1–22. …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
Structure of UAS-YOLO network.
Published 2025“…These characteristics impose high demands on detection algorithms in terms of fine-grained feature extraction, cross-scale fusion capability, and occlusion resistance.The YOLOv11s model has significant limitations in practical applications: its feature extraction module has a single semantic representation, the traditional feature pyramid network has limited capability to detect multi-scale targets, and it lacks an effective feature compensation mechanism when targets are occluded.To address these issues, we propose a UAV aerial small target detection algorithm named UAS-YOLO (Universal Inverted Bottleneck with Adaptive BiFPN and Separated and Enhancement Attention module YOLO), which incorporates three key optimizations. …”
-
19
Transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) (N = 6).
Published 2024“…<p><b>(A)</b> During the cultivation of SMC and ALI we observed significantly differences on day 18 (SMC: 9.61 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 7.73 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) and day 25 (SMC: 8.19 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; ALI: 6.44 kΩ*cm<sup>2</sup>; p<0.05) ALI cultures showed significantly decreased values compared to SMC. …”
-
20