Search alternatives:
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
significant effect » significant impact (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
effect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Between-group differences in 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS during postural training.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
-
10
Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS.
Published 2025Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
17
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
18
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
19
-
20