Search alternatives:
significant time » significant threat (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
time revealed » mice revealed (Expand Search), test revealed (Expand Search), gene revealed (Expand Search)
significant time » significant threat (Expand Search), significant cause (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
time revealed » mice revealed (Expand Search), test revealed (Expand Search), gene revealed (Expand Search)
-
1
MS decreases the larger amplitude distribution in adult rats.
Published 2023Subjects: “…glutamatergic events decreased…”
-
2
Significant interaction (time by group) for PPTd.
Published 2022“…<p>The measurement of pain pressure threshold (mean±standard error) on the Deltoid (PPTd) showed that responders (black solid line) demonstrated a significant decrease in PPTd following eccentric exercise. …”
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
The carotid canal area is larger on the unaffected side than on the affected side in patients with unilateral moyamoya disease, but the difference decreases according to the contra...
Published 2021“…<p>(A) shows the carotid canal area compared between the affected side and the unaffected side in patients with unilateral moyamoya disease, and the unaffected side is significantly wider than the affected side (p = 0.018). …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
18
-
19
-
20