Search alternatives:
significant waste » significant cause (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search), significant based (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
waste generated » waste generation (Expand Search), data generated (Expand Search), values generated (Expand Search)
significant waste » significant cause (Expand Search), significant anti (Expand Search), significant based (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
waste generated » waste generation (Expand Search), data generated (Expand Search), values generated (Expand Search)
-
1
MS decreases the larger amplitude distribution in adult rats.
Published 2023Subjects: “…glutamatergic events decreased…”
-
2
-
3
Transportation plan when the amount of medical waste generated increases significantly.
Published 2025“…<p>Transportation plan when the amount of medical waste generated increases significantly.</p>…”
-
4
This is Transportation plan when the amount of medical waste generated increases significantly.
Published 2025“…<p>This is Transportation plan when the amount of medical waste generated increases significantly.</p>…”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Knowledge of waste handlers on different types of waste generated in isolation unit.
Published 2024Subjects: -
9
-
10
The carotid canal area is larger on the unaffected side than on the affected side in patients with unilateral moyamoya disease, but the difference decreases according to the contra...
Published 2021“…<p>(A) shows the carotid canal area compared between the affected side and the unaffected side in patients with unilateral moyamoya disease, and the unaffected side is significantly wider than the affected side (p = 0.018). …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20