Showing 1 - 20 results of 114,632 for search '(( significantly ((_ decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significantly rate increased ))', query time: 2.67s Refine Results
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…(B) In dCA1, spatial information was decreased in APP/PS1 mice relative to C57BL/6 controls (mean ± std: C57BL/6 = 0.132 ± 0.048, APP/PS1 = 0.128 ± 0.051, p < 0.005, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>C57BL/6</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>APP/PS1</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9

    GO analysis of stage-salient genes in the order of decreasing significance (i.e, increasing p–value). by Sangeetha Muthamilselvan (8966006)

    Published 2022
    “…<p>GO analysis of stage-salient genes in the order of decreasing significance (i.e, increasing p–value).</p>…”
  10. 10
  11. 11

    Decrease of the mean number of natural teeth and POPs with age. by Sul-Hee Kim (11873853)

    Published 2021
    “…<p>The number of (A) natural teeth and (B) POPs significantly decreased with age in both males and females (<i>P</i> < 0.001). …”
  12. 12

    Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment. by Ranjeeta Adhikari (9905958)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Traits at cellular, leaf, and whole-plant scales which were significantly different [increased (↑) or decreased (↓)] or non-significant between tolerant and sensitive cultivars in the N-deficient treatment.…”
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

    The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified. by Krzysztof Kochanek (835532)

    Published 2024
    “…<p>The number of gauging cross-sections where a statistically significant decreasing trend was identified.</p>…”
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20