Search alternatives:
significant cause » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
cause revealed » also revealed (Expand Search), cycle revealed (Expand Search), rats revealed (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant cause » significant change (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
cause revealed » also revealed (Expand Search), cycle revealed (Expand Search), rats revealed (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
Autophagy significantly influences the apoptotic levels of RGCs in glaucomatous mouse eyes.
Published 2024Subjects: -
15
Capsaicin, pyridoxine, vincristine sulfate and ionomycin significantly decreased axon length ratio but only pyridoxine had no impact on neurotoxicity.
Published 2024“…(<b>A</b>) Caps significantly reduced axon length ratio over time and was significantly lower compared to EtOH control in both male and female rat DRGs. …”
-
16
-
17
The carotid canal area is larger on the unaffected side than on the affected side in patients with unilateral moyamoya disease, but the difference decreases according to the contra...
Published 2021“…<p>(A) shows the carotid canal area compared between the affected side and the unaffected side in patients with unilateral moyamoya disease, and the unaffected side is significantly wider than the affected side (p = 0.018). …”
-
18
-
19
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
20