Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease observed » increases observed (Expand Search), case observed (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
decrease observed » increases observed (Expand Search), case observed (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
Significant repeated measurements sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…The percentage of activation in the left PLL maximum peak right-hand layup is higher in the non CAI group with a large effect size in single measurements. In relation to motor control, a higher overall signal dispersion is observed in CAI group there is evidence of worse motor control.…”
-
96
Significant single measurement sEMG outcomes.
Published 2025“…The percentage of activation in the left PLL maximum peak right-hand layup is higher in the non CAI group with a large effect size in single measurements. In relation to motor control, a higher overall signal dispersion is observed in CAI group there is evidence of worse motor control.…”
-
97
-
98
-
99
-
100