Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1741
The structure of attention gate block [31].
Published 2025“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1742
DSC block and its application network structure.
Published 2025“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1743
The structure of multi-scale residual block [30].
Published 2025“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1744
The structure of IRAU and Res2Net+ block [22].
Published 2025“…The actual accuracy and mean latency time of the model were 92.43% and 260ms, respectively. …”
-
1745
Effects of Ni<sup>2</sup><sup>+</sup> on the mitochondrial and glycolytic energy metabolism of BMDM.
Published 2025“…A double dagger (‡) indicates a significant decrease of OCR (slope = −0.14 ± 0.04, <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.40, <i>F</i>(1, 22)=15.0, <i>p </i>< 0.001) from 0 to 72 ppm Ni<sup>2+</sup>. …”
-
1746
Cortical and subcortical regions feature distinct early and late responses during audition.
Published 2025“…The mean no-stimulus trial spectrograms were subtracted from the mean maximum-intensity trial spectrograms, and a cluster-based permutation testing was employed to identify significant differences between the conditions (p < 0.05, 5000 iterations). …”
-
1747
Passive listening and go/No-go tasks feature comparable electrophysiological responses.
Published 2025“…The mean no-stimulus trial spectrograms were subtracted from the mean maximum-intensity trial spectrograms, and a cluster-based permutation testing was employed to identify significant differences between the conditions (p < 0.05, 5000 iterations). …”
-
1748
-
1749
-
1750
Chemogenetic inhibition of Calcrl<sup>+</sup> neurons attenuates chronic itch in multiple chronic itch models.
Published 2025“…<p><b>(A-C)</b> Allergic Contact Dermatitis (ACD) Model (n = 7 mice for each group): Experimental timeline showing intraspinal viral injection, ACD model induction, and behavioral testing phases <b>(A)</b>; Quantification of mechanical itch responses revealed significant CNO-mediated suppression in hM4Di mice, with no effect in vehicle-treated controls <b>(B)</b>; Spontaneous scratching frequency decreased following CNO administration <b>(C)</b>. …”
-
1751
Dataset visualization diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1752
Dataset sample images.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1753
Performance comparison of different models.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1754
C2f and BC2f module structure diagrams.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1755
YOLOv8n detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1756
YOLOv8n-BWG model structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1757
BiFormer structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1758
YOLOv8n-BWG detection results diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1759
GSConv module structure diagram.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”
-
1760
Performance comparison of three loss functions.
Published 2025“…Results on a specialized dataset reveal that YOLOv8n-BWG outperforms YOLOv8n by increasing the mean Average Precision (mAP) by 4.2%, boosting recognition speed by 21.3% per second, and decreasing both the number of floating-point operations (FLOPs) by 28.9% and model size by 26.3%. …”