Search alternatives:
significant effects » significant effect (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
effects decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), effects regress (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant effects » significant effect (Expand Search), significantly affected (Expand Search)
effects decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), effects regress (Expand Search)
nn decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), mean decrease (Expand Search), gy decreased (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
6241
-
6242
Baseline Characteristics of Study Participants.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that DT training significantly improves and retains DT performance, likely due to a reduction in cognitive-motor interference. …”
-
6243
Raw and processed data files.
Published 2025“…The results demonstrate that DT training significantly improves and retains DT performance, likely due to a reduction in cognitive-motor interference. …”
-
6244
-
6245
-
6246
-
6247
Oligonucleotides used in this study.
Published 2024“…In comparison to the parent strain, the 0690::Tn mutant displayed markedly reduced fitness, as evidenced by a significant decrease or even absence in post-challenge mycoplasma counts in murine and cow mammary tissues, respectively. …”
-
6248
Data supporting the findings of this study.
Published 2024“…In comparison to the parent strain, the 0690::Tn mutant displayed markedly reduced fitness, as evidenced by a significant decrease or even absence in post-challenge mycoplasma counts in murine and cow mammary tissues, respectively. …”
-
6249
-
6250
-
6251
-
6252
Open data.
Published 2025“…</p><p>Results</p><p>There was a significant decrease in BMD in the lumbar spine (1.107 ± 0.109 and 1.075 ± 0.112 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), total body (1.135 ± 0.086 and 1.119 ± 0.085 g/cm<sup>2</sup>; <i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001), and total proximal femur over the six months of EBF compared to the values obtained from the same EBF group at 15 days postpartum (mean percentage decreases in BMD of −3.4 ± 3.7% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in lumbar spine, −2.5 ± 3.4% (<i><i>p</i></i> < 0.001) in total proximal femur, and −1.7 ± 1.9% (<i><i>p</i></i> = 0.001) in total body). …”
-
6253
-
6254
-
6255
-
6256
-
6257
-
6258
Excel data extraction.
Published 2025“…The statistical analysis was carried out using STATA version 17, which includes descriptive analysis, forest plots for prevalence, funnel plot, and an Egger test to examine publication bias. A random-effects model was used to determine the pooled effect estimate. …”
-
6259
-
6260