Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
2621
-
2622
-
2623
-
2624
-
2625
Significance analysis data.
Published 2025“…The results indicate that: (1) The manifestation of mining pressure in gangue backfill mining is influenced by factors such as mining height and backfill collapse ratio; (2) Under the support of coal gangue, the concentrated stress in the coal seam significantly decreases, forming an arched shape according to the mining stages; (3) The range of plastic failure in the coal seam remains relatively stable under gangue backfill mining, with the plastic zone of the roof plate exhibiting a strip-like distribution; (4) Both range analysis and variance analysis revealed that the sensitivity ranking is backfill collapse ratio > mining height > elastic modulus. …”
-
2626
Effects of alcohol on bone morphology and alcohol metabolism ability in female and male rats.
Published 2025“…Two-way ANOVA of osteoclasts number: sex effect <i>p</i> = 0.264, alcohol effect <i>p</i> = 0.001, no significant sex-by-alcohol interaction (<i>p</i> = 0.203). …”
-
2627
-
2628
Connectivity (frontal, axial, and sagittal planes) and color maps of between-group analysis of the tDCS intervention.
Published 2024“…<p>The colored edge represents connections with significant differences. (A) Maps shows decreased connectivity between left ACC and right INS in the HB-a-tDCS on DLPFC group in the delta frequency band which present large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.69). …”
-
2629
Connectivity maps and color maps of within-group analysis of the tDCS intervention.
Published 2024“…<p>The colored edge represents connections with significant differences. Data represent the delta-value of the mean oscillation of the frequency band from pre- to post-treatment in each brain region. …”
-
2630
-
2631
-
2632
-
2633
Results of normal and wide step width (cm).
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2634
Raw data 16–20.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2635
Demographics, SD= Standard Deviation.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2636
Raw data 6–9 and 15.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2637
Raw data 1–5.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2638
Raw data 10–14.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2639
Coordination angle during running.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
2640
Gait retraining with biofeedback.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”