Search alternatives:
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant non » significant gap (Expand Search), significant amount (Expand Search)
non decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), point decrease (Expand Search), note decreased (Expand Search)
-
1
The table shows the significant and non-significant altered group with different parameters.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Downregulation of <i>TcPiezo1</i> expression decreases Ca<sup>2+</sup> entry in <i>T. cruzi.</i>
Published 2025“…(A) Addition of 1.8 mM Ca<sup>2+</sup> in Tet-induced <i>TcPiezo1</i> cells (+Tet) elicited a lower increase in intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> than in non-induced cells (-Tet). (B) Downregulation of <i>TcPiezo1</i> expression showed a significant decrease of intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> (+Tet). …”
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Vertebral cancellous tissueμCT parameters are not significantly affected by aging from 16 to 21 weeks, housing type, or microgravity.
Published 2025“…Data shown are the mean ± standard deviation with a scatter plot (ns: non-significant). (G) μCT volumetric reconstructions of a representative sample from each group show a slight decrease in bone parameters from FL mice, which are not deemed significant by statistical testing.…”
-
18
-
19
-
20