Search alternatives:
significant inter » significant interest (Expand Search), significant inverse (Expand Search), significant concern (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
inter decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significant inter » significant interest (Expand Search), significant inverse (Expand Search), significant concern (Expand Search)
affect decrease » effects decreased (Expand Search), largest decrease (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
inter decrease » linear decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
related to Fig 4. ROS, K+ efflux and cathepsin B do not affect TNFα production in response to eggs.
Published 2025Subjects: -
5
-
6
(A) Auxiliary marking points to ensure complete and accurate seating of the prosthesis.
Published 2025Subjects: -
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
Intra- and inter-day precision and accuracy.
Published 2025“…<div><p>Purpose</p><p>Statins are the most commonly used drugs worldwide. Besides a significant decrease in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) risk, the use of statins is also connected with a broad beneficial pleiotropic effect. …”
-
11
-
12
Results of normal and wide step width (cm).
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
13
Raw data 16–20.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
14
Demographics, SD= Standard Deviation.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
15
Raw data 6–9 and 15.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
16
Raw data 1–5.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
17
Raw data 10–14.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
18
Coordination angle during running.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
19
Gait retraining with biofeedback.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”
-
20
Coordination angle during walking.
Published 2025“…Wide running significantly decreased the coordination variability in the ankle-knee sagittal during LR (p<0.001) and knee-hip sagittal during LR (p=0.007) and push-off (p=0.016). …”