AMP binding free energy calculations and per-residue decomposition of holo and PfIleRS-SANC systems. by Curtis Chepsiror (21368103)

Fig 9 - BC. by Curtis Chepsiror (21368103)

Fig 10 - EC. by Curtis Chepsiror (21368103)

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Lubrication Behavior of Fullerene-Coated Nanoparticles on Rough Surfaces by Guangchao Han (1453198)

“…The optimal nanoparticle concentration reaches approximately 88.8% under high-load conditions, with each 3.55% increase in concentration resulting in a 0.45% reduction in structural deformation and a 0.59 nN decrease in friction. Under low-load conditions, the optimal concentration ranges from 15% to 30% across varying surface roughness levels, reducing friction by 30%–55% compared to the peak kinetic energy conditions. …”

Line graph illustrating mean random blood glucose (mmol/L) at weekly intervals during the induction phase. by Elsie D. Oduor (22521785)

Subjects:

Mean liver weight (g) (A), liver weight/body ratio (B), hepatic triglyceride (mg/g) (C) and hepatic steatosis quantification (% area) (D) upon completion of the treatment phase. by Elsie D. Oduor (22521785)

Subjects: