Search alternatives:
significance levels » significance level (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
levels decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), levels increased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
alter decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significance levels » significance level (Expand Search)
marked decrease » marked increase (Expand Search)
levels decrease » levels decreased (Expand Search), levels increased (Expand Search), rivers decreased (Expand Search)
alter decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), water decreases (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
Altered expression of genes related to Ca<sup>2+</sup> cycling or myocardial contraction.
Published 2025Subjects: -
2
-
3
Metabolites with decreasing levels during the development.
Published 2025“…<p>Temporal profiles of polar metabolites and lipids with SCN levels significantly decreasing from E19 to P28. Rhythmicity was determined by eJTK; full or dashed lines depict the profiles that either did or did not pass the significance threshold (FDR-adjusted <i>P</i> < 0.05), respectively.…”
-
4
HFD decreases ITM and alters metabolic homeostasis.
Published 2025“…<b>(C)</b> Relative circulating glucose levels. HFD-fed flies significantly increased basal glucose levels compared to ND-fed flies. …”
-
5
ATGL-1 levels increase and lipid droplets decrease in response to <i>N. parisii</i> infection.
Published 2025Subjects: -
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
Increased or reduced ATGL-1 activity does not significantly change <i>N. parisii</i> growth.
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
-
11
Alterations of Ceramides, Acylcarnitines, GlyceroLPLs, and Amines in NSCLC Tissues
Published 2024Subjects: -
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
Linear covariate analysis of prognostically significant metabolites. Presenting the effect sizes of metabolites that showed significant differences among prognostic groups in ICU-treated COVID-19 patients. Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA....
Published 2025“…Metabolites were included based on an F-value > 2.5 and a p-value < 0.05. Metabolites marked with a single asterisk (*) were significant in both two-way ANOVA and ASCA, whereas those marked with double asterisks (**) were significant only in two-way ANOVA. …”
-
20