Search alternatives:
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
better decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
significantly lower » significantly higher (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
better decrease » teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
lower decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search)
-
2261
-
2262
Descriptive statistics of the sample.
Published 2025“…On the contrary, the likelihood of weighing a child at birth decreases with parity.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The study highlights the need to target pregnant women of lower socioeconomic status for interventions aimed at averting severe morbidity and mortality occasioned by conditions of low birthweight.…”
-
2263
Sample size characteristics.
Published 2025“…On the contrary, the likelihood of weighing a child at birth decreases with parity.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The study highlights the need to target pregnant women of lower socioeconomic status for interventions aimed at averting severe morbidity and mortality occasioned by conditions of low birthweight.…”
-
2264
Data used for the Study.
Published 2025“…On the contrary, the likelihood of weighing a child at birth decreases with parity.</p><p>Conclusion</p><p>The study highlights the need to target pregnant women of lower socioeconomic status for interventions aimed at averting severe morbidity and mortality occasioned by conditions of low birthweight.…”
-
2265
-
2266
-
2267
-
2268
-
2269
-
2270
-
2271
-
2272
-
2273
-
2274
-
2275
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
2276
Criteria for study selection.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
2277
-
2278
Sociodemographic data of the sample.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
2279
Flowchart of the study.
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”
-
2280
Bandages: KT (3A) and RT (3B).
Published 2025“…Group-by-time interaction showed significant differences for the lunge test (p = 0.045), SLDJ height (p = 0.014), flight time (p = 0.019) and ground contact time (p = 0.035). …”