Showing 1,901 - 1,920 results of 5,011 for search '(( significantly ((better decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significant linear decrease ))', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 1901

    Comparison chart of model evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  2. 1902

    Model performance evaluation results. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  3. 1903

    The result compared with other existing methods. by Ke Yan (331581)

    Published 2024
    “…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
  4. 1904

    Driving variables recorded from the simulator. by Mobina Faqani (22783963)

    Published 2025
    “…Additionally, HF conversation was associated with a decrease in ART among conservative participants, while it significantly increased TIBL for both moderate and conservative groups. …”
  5. 1905

    Geometric manifold comparison visualization by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

    Published 2025
    “…While many tr-FC approaches have been proposed, most are linear approaches, e.g. computing the linear correlation at a timestep or within a window. …”
  6. 1906

    Hyperparameter ranges by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

    Published 2025
    “…While many tr-FC approaches have been proposed, most are linear approaches, e.g. computing the linear correlation at a timestep or within a window. …”
  7. 1907

    Convolutional vs RNN context encoder by Eloy Geenjaar (21533195)

    Published 2025
    “…While many tr-FC approaches have been proposed, most are linear approaches, e.g. computing the linear correlation at a timestep or within a window. …”
  8. 1908

    High Stability, Piezoelectric Response, and Promising Photocatalytic Activity on the New Pentagonal CGeP<sub>4</sub> Monolayer by José A. S. Laranjeira (18870824)

    Published 2024
    “…Under compressive strain, the band gap decreases almost linearly to 2.65 eV at −8% strain and then drops sharply to 0.97 eV, an ∼69% variation. …”
  9. 1909

    High Stability, Piezoelectric Response, and Promising Photocatalytic Activity on the New Pentagonal CGeP<sub>4</sub> Monolayer by José A. S. Laranjeira (18870824)

    Published 2024
    “…Under compressive strain, the band gap decreases almost linearly to 2.65 eV at −8% strain and then drops sharply to 0.97 eV, an ∼69% variation. …”
  10. 1910
  11. 1911

    Changes in alpha diversity in the weeks before anti-TNF-a treatment. by Katrine Carlsen (5477300)

    Published 2024
    “…The analysis found a significant association across all subjects for Shannon diversity with decreasing diversity in the lead up to the next treatment (lmer model, beta = -0.018, <i>p</i> = 0.036) and no association for observed diversity (<i>p</i>>0.1). …”
  12. 1912

    Domains of NoCs. by Gizachew Tadele Tiruneh (8407686)

    Published 2025
    “…Perinatal mortality decreased by 34%, from 31.3 to 20.1 per 1,000 births [t-test: 2.12; p-value: 0.040)].…”
  13. 1913

    Arrangement of PHC facilities in a woreda NoCs. by Gizachew Tadele Tiruneh (8407686)

    Published 2025
    “…Perinatal mortality decreased by 34%, from 31.3 to 20.1 per 1,000 births [t-test: 2.12; p-value: 0.040)].…”
  14. 1914

    Demographic and ocular features. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
  15. 1915

    Machine learning model to diagnose PCG. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
  16. 1916

    ROC curves of TAS + SOD + MDA to diagnose PCG. by Mingxi Shao (10066570)

    Published 2025
    “…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
  17. 1917
  18. 1918

    Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients. by Michele Angelo Colombo (22446342)

    Published 2025
    “…The shaded area indicates the bootstrapped 95% confidence interval for the geometric mean across participants. <b>(B)</b> The PSD in the Slow Delta band (0.5–2 Hz) was significantly larger in the disconnected (Discon) than in the contralateral (Contra) cortex, only in the session after surgery. …”
  19. 1919

    Supplementary file 1_Source apportionment and ecological risk of heavy metals in Taihu lake from 2020 to 2022.docx by Guangjing Bao (21837749)

    Published 2025
    “…Furthermore, the potential ecological risk exhibited a significant decreasing trend, with Z-values passing the 95% confidence interval significance test, except for S3. …”
  20. 1920