Search alternatives:
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significantly linear » significant linear (Expand Search), significantly lower (Expand Search), significantly longer (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), teer decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
1901
-
1902
Overall model framework.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
1903
Key parameters of LSTM training model.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
1904
Comparison chart of model evaluation results.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
1905
Model performance evaluation results.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
1906
The result compared with other existing methods.
Published 2024“…The results show that: (1) From the experimental data of word sense disambiguation, the accuracy of the SMOSS-LSTM model proposed in this paper is the lowest when the context range is "3+3", then it rises in turn at "5+5" and "7+7", reaches the highest at "7+7", and then begins to decrease at "10+10"; (2) Compared with the control group, the accuracy of syntactic analysis in the experimental group reached 89.5%, while that in the control group was only 73.2%. (3) In the aspect of English text error detection, the detection accuracy of the proposed model in the experimental group is as high as 94.8%, which is significantly better than the traditional SMOSS-based text error detection method, and its accuracy is only 68.3%. (4) Compared with other existing researches, although it is slightly inferior to Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) in word sense disambiguation, this proposed model performs well in syntactic analysis and English text error detection, and its comprehensive performance is excellent. …”
-
1907
Driving variables recorded from the simulator.
Published 2025“…Additionally, HF conversation was associated with a decrease in ART among conservative participants, while it significantly increased TIBL for both moderate and conservative groups. …”
-
1908
-
1909
Domains of NoCs.
Published 2025“…Perinatal mortality decreased by 34%, from 31.3 to 20.1 per 1,000 births [t-test: 2.12; p-value: 0.040)].…”
-
1910
Arrangement of PHC facilities in a woreda NoCs.
Published 2025“…Perinatal mortality decreased by 34%, from 31.3 to 20.1 per 1,000 births [t-test: 2.12; p-value: 0.040)].…”
-
1911
Demographic and ocular features.
Published 2025“…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
-
1912
Machine learning model to diagnose PCG.
Published 2025“…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
-
1913
ROC curves of TAS + SOD + MDA to diagnose PCG.
Published 2025“…Pearson analysis revealed significant negative correlations: SOD with anterior chamber depth (r = −0.445, p = 0.012) and H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> with mean deviation values for the visual field (r = −0.412, p = 0.041). …”
-
1914
Group-level narrow- and broad-band spectral changes after hemispherotomy reveal a marked EEG slowing of the isolated cortex, robust across patients.
Published 2025“…The shaded area indicates the bootstrapped 95% confidence interval for the geometric mean across participants. <b>(B)</b> The PSD in the Slow Delta band (0.5–2 Hz) was significantly larger in the disconnected (Discon) than in the contralateral (Contra) cortex, only in the session after surgery. …”
-
1915
Supplementary file 1_Source apportionment and ecological risk of heavy metals in Taihu lake from 2020 to 2022.docx
Published 2025“…Furthermore, the potential ecological risk exhibited a significant decreasing trend, with Z-values passing the 95% confidence interval significance test, except for S3. …”
-
1916
-
1917
-
1918
-
1919
Sociodemographic Characteristics of Sample 2.
Published 2025“…We also found that the mean agreement with the IB-DE subscale decreased after the pandemic. …”
-
1920
English and German versions of OUS.
Published 2025“…We also found that the mean agreement with the IB-DE subscale decreased after the pandemic. …”