Showing 2,161 - 2,180 results of 4,372 for search '(( significantly ((better decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significantly longer decrease ))', query time: 0.60s Refine Results
  1. 2161
  2. 2162
  3. 2163
  4. 2164
  5. 2165
  6. 2166
  7. 2167
  8. 2168
  9. 2169
  10. 2170
  11. 2171
  12. 2172
  13. 2173
  14. 2174
  15. 2175
  16. 2176
  17. 2177

    Microhardness vs. depth diagram of sample No. 6 ( by Van-Thuc Nguyen (19469762)

    Published 2025
    “…<div><p>This study investigates the effects of arc length, current intensity, travel speed, gas flow rate, and pulse time on surface hardness to better understand the arc quenching of S45C steel with a curved shape. …”
  18. 2178

    Fig 8 - by Shima Bahramizadeh-Sajadi (20391247)

    Published 2024
    “…Although ring category has a greater effect on these measures than the cross-sectional area, the area also affects the results: Increasing the cross-sectional area of the ring causes the cornea to flatten, resulting in a decrease in K<sub>mean</sub> and axial length. The cornea also becomes thinner when larger rings are used and the contact pressure between the ring and the cornea increases. …”
  19. 2179

    Addressing Imbalanced Classification Problems in Drug Discovery and Development Using Random Forest, Support Vector Machine, AutoGluon-Tabular, and H2O AutoML by Ayush Garg (21090944)

    Published 2025
    “…The important findings of our studies are as follows: (i) there is no effect of threshold optimization on ranking metrics such as AUC and AUPR, but AUC and AUPR get affected by class-weighting and SMOTTomek; (ii) for ML methods RF and SVM, significant percentage improvement up to 375, 33.33, and 450 over all the data sets can be achieved, respectively, for F1 score, MCC, and balanced accuracy, which are suitable for performance evaluation of imbalanced data sets; (iii) for AutoML libraries AutoGluon-Tabular and H2O AutoML, significant percentage improvement up to 383.33, 37.25, and 533.33 over all the data sets can be achieved, respectively, for F1 score, MCC, and balanced accuracy; (iv) the general pattern of percentage improvement in balanced accuracy is that the percentage improvement increases when the class ratio is systematically decreased from 0.5 to 0.1; in the case of F1 score and MCC, maximum improvement is achieved at the class ratio of 0.3; (v) for both ML and AutoML with balancing, it is observed that any individual class-balancing technique does not outperform all other methods on a significantly higher number of data sets based on F1 score; (vi) the three external balancing techniques combined outperformed the internal balancing methods of the ML and AutoML; (vii) AutoML tools perform as good as the ML models and in some cases perform even better for handling imbalanced classification when applied with imbalance handling techniques. …”
  20. 2180