Search alternatives:
significantly slight » significantly lighter (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
slight decrease » slight increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significantly slight » significantly lighter (Expand Search), significantly high (Expand Search), significantly higher (Expand Search)
better decrease » greater decrease (Expand Search), between decreased (Expand Search)
slight decrease » slight increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
41
-
42
-
43
-
44
-
45
-
46
-
47
The effect of HA digestion and HA replenishment alone or with CS on barrier function measured by TEER.
Published 2025“…PS decreased TEER. (C) Different treatments (treatment groups n = 8)with HA and/or CS did not affect TEER recovery after PS treatment, full recovery was seen in all groups after 24 hours. …”
-
48
-
49
Basic physical parameters of shield residue.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
50
Primary composition of experimental materials.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
51
Compaction test results.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
52
Experimental mix proportions.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
53
CBR test results.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
54
Change in moisture content of stabilized soil.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
55
Relationship between UCS and curing time.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
56
Strength characteristic curve of stabilized soil.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
57
Change in pH value of stabilized soil.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
58
CBR test results at different curing time.
Published 2024“…The results show that the UCS and CBR values enhanced significantly with the increase in curing time. However, the moisture content and pH of the stabilized soil exhibited a decreasing trend. …”
-
59
-
60