Search alternatives:
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
changed decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search), caused decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
significant point » significant amount (Expand Search), significant part (Expand Search), significant event (Expand Search)
changed decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search), caused decreased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
point increase » unit increase (Expand Search)
-
1
MS decreases the larger amplitude distribution in adult rats.
Published 2023Subjects: “…glutamatergic events decreased…”
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Summary of the earliest time point for significant WD-induced changes in NASH-associated markers.
Published 2023“…The figure illustrates the earliest time point for a significant change in the marker abundance and whether the marker <b>Increased</b> or <b>Decreased</b> in response to the WD. …”
-
8
-
9
Change in rectal temperature following pre-medication, induction and inhalant anesthesia.
Published 2025Subjects: -
10
-
11
Change in the levels of parental stressors or rewards between time point 1 and time point 2.
Published 2022Subjects: -
12
-
13
Taxonomic changes grouped by phylum and direction of change in relative abundance that were significantly different in either time point comparison by PERMANOVA analysis.
Published 2022“…Log2 fold change (Log2FC) between mean relative abundances at each time point are colored in orange for increasing fold change, and blue for decreasing fold change. …”
-
14
-
15
-
16
-
17
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
Pathological changes in lung tissue of mice exposed to continuous inhalation of CS.
Published 2024Subjects: