Search alternatives:
significant largest » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant largest » significantly larger (Expand Search), significant changes (Expand Search), significant dangers (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
largest decrease » larger decrease (Expand Search), marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
81
-
82
-
83
-
84
-
85
-
86
-
87
-
88
-
89
-
90
-
91
-
92
-
93
-
94
-
95
-
96
-
97
Analysis of the Nugent score before (T=0) and after (T=1) the use of the vaginal gel. Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).
Published 2025“…Number of participants and respective percentages of Nugent scores before and after the intervention. A statistically significant decrease in Nugent scores was observed after the intervention (p value =0.0047).…”
-
98
-
99
Detailed information of the observation datasets.
Published 2025“…On longer time scales (6–24 hours), the score and correlation between ERA5 and observations further increased, while the centered root-mean-square error (CRMSE) and standard deviation decrease. 4) Hourly wind data with a regular spatial distribution in ERA5 reanalysis provides valuable information for further detailed research on meteorology or renewable energy perspectives, but some inherent shortcomings should be considered.…”
-
100