Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greatest decrease » treatment decreased (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
581
SAR distribution in the cerebrum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
582
-
583
-
584
-
585
-
586
SAR distribution in the cerebellum comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
587
-
588
-
589
SAR distribution in the brainstem comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
590
-
591
Simulated and measured S-parameters comparison of miniaturized MIMO mobile terminal antenna.
Published 2025Subjects: -
592
-
593
-
594
SAR distribution in the skull comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
595
-
596
SAR distribution in the scalp comparison before and after antenna miniaturized (Unit: W/kg).
Published 2025Subjects: -
597
Pre-RT and post RT D-dimer levels in associated with prognostic significance.
Published 2025Subjects: -
598
Increased or reduced ATGL-1 activity does not significantly change <i>N. parisii</i> growth.
Published 2025Subjects: -
599
-
600
Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.
Published 2024“…<p>Average % peptides counts for different classes of proteins at different germination time points and significant p-value indicated as compared to soaked sample (*p< 0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001) for brown non-trypsinised with shades of green showing increase and red showing decrease with respect to soaked.…”