Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test. by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test (<i>n</i> = 900). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by age groups (<i>n</i> = 900). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up (<i>n</i> = 662). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Percentage of correct responses for each item of the achievement test. by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by gender (<i>n</i> = 662). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and post-test by gender (<i>n</i> = 900). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

S1 File - by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Objectives for each meeting of the training course for the intervention providers. by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Mean scores compared with paired-samples <i>t</i>-test (and related effect sizes) at pre- and follow-up by age group (<i>n</i> = 662). by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Mean scores for each item of the training course’s satisfaction test. by Maria Anna Donati (6735548)

Subjects:

Top 10 significantly changed metabolites and lipids in each clinical outcome measure group. by Patricia Sikorski (1320966)

“…P-values < 0.05 are statistically significant. Individual p-values for each metabolite and lipid are reported in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0287654#pone.0287654.s005" target="_blank">S2 Table</a>.…”

Significant decrease of the coiled-coil score in the double proline-substituted CAHS3 mutant. by Akihiro Tanaka (342394)

Flow diagram of the study. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

“…The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”

Baseline characteristics of patients. by Yoonjee Cho (15453454)

“…The SOFA score on POD 5 was significantly higher in the High-decrease group compared with the Low-decrease group (5.2 ± 2.6 vs. 4.1 ± 2.3; mean difference: 1.1, 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.8; P = 0.005). …”

<i>ompF</i> mutants have slightly impaired growth in the presence of doxycycline. by Hector S. Alvarez-Manzo (12551730)

Results from concurrent and prospective analyses. by Adam P. McGuire (9961691)

Subjects:

Fig 1 - by Adam P. McGuire (9961691)

Subjects:

Descriptive and inferential statistics. by Adam P. McGuire (9961691)

Subjects:

Demographic characteristics. by Adam P. McGuire (9961691)

Subjects: