Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
i decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
2621
-
2622
-
2623
Microflow Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Multinozzle Electrospray Ionization for Improved Lipidomics Coverage of 3D Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Published 2025“…A far higher sensitivity can be obtained with electrospray at nanoflow (10–1000 nL/min) thanks to a better ionization efficiency and significant decrease in matrix effects. …”
-
2624
-
2625
-
2626
-
2627
-
2628
-
2629
Test soil parameters.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”
-
2630
Influence of UHMWPE length on swelling pressure.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”
-
2631
UHMWPF parameters.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”
-
2632
Influence of UHMWPE content on swelling pressure.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”
-
2633
Soil partice-size distribution.
Published 2025“…When the UHMWPE content exceeds 0.3% the weight of the soil, there is no significant decrease in the swelling pressure of the reinforced soil (<i>p</i> = 0.052, close to the threshold of significance). …”
-
2634
Design of the D-trial.
Published 2024“…Empirical models for the relationships between the investigated plant traits and PD/DVP were created using linear regression analysis preceded by a lack-of-fit test. An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
2635
Estimated mean values for light interception.
Published 2024“…Empirical models for the relationships between the investigated plant traits and PD/DVP were created using linear regression analysis preceded by a lack-of-fit test. An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
2636
Raw data V-trial.
Published 2024“…Empirical models for the relationships between the investigated plant traits and PD/DVP were created using linear regression analysis preceded by a lack-of-fit test. An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
2637
Raw data D-trial.
Published 2024“…Empirical models for the relationships between the investigated plant traits and PD/DVP were created using linear regression analysis preceded by a lack-of-fit test. An increase in PD led to a linear decrease in inflorescence yield per plant (<i>p</i> = 0.02), whereas a positive linear relationship was found for inflorescence yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0001) and CBD yield (<i>p</i> = 0.0002) per m<sup>2</sup>. …”
-
2638
Average stability values (mean ± standard deviation) and statistical results.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2639
Individual stability values for different gait events under various conditions.
Published 2024Subjects: -
2640
Anti-<i>Na</i>-GST-1 IgG antibody levels and seroresponse rates by vaccine group and study day.
Published 2024Subjects: