Mean ± SD values of unipedal stance parameters evaluated at the different time points of the postural training session. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Mean ± SD of the different parameters relative to bipedal stance on soft support with the eyes open recorded in the Chewing and Hand Grip groups. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Time course of Path Length, LFS and Velocity during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Relation of the changes in Y Sway Amplitude and LFS induced by postural training with those in 95% Area. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Training-induced changes in bipedal stance. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Between-group differences in 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Relation between training-related changes in unipedal and bipedal stance. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: 95% Area, Y Sway Amplitude and LFS. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Consolidation of training-induced changes in unipedal stance: Path Length, X Sway Amplitude and Velocity. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Time course of 95% Area, X and Y Amplitude Sway during postural training. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Correlations between unipedal and bipedal stance parameters recorded at the beginning of the training and of the control session. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Flow diagram. by Cristina Dolciotti (16317330)

Subjects:

Restricted cubic spline plots showing the association between changes in PAL and risk of CVD. by Haiwei Li (282229)

Data. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”

Baseline characteristics of patients. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”

Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and total area reduction ratio of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) during follow-up. by Su Hwan Park (15158181)

Demographics of the study population. by Sohyun Park (78358)

“…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”

Table 3 - by Sohyun Park (78358)

“…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”

Distribution of <i>L</i>(<i>p</i>) with an absolute error when a single observation is randomly sampled at each time point, with the smallest observation (blue) and the largest obs... by Hyeontae Jo (20469463)

Data Sheet 1_Efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with 125I seed implantation for iodine-refractory thyroid cancer.docx by Zhijun Chen (254277)

“…Serum Tg levels declined significantly from baseline in all groups. No major procedural complications occurred, and treatment-related adverse reactions were mostly mild (Grade 1–2) and comparable among groups.…”