Search alternatives:
clinical decrease » clinical disease (Expand Search), clinical case (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
clinical decrease » clinical disease (Expand Search), clinical case (Expand Search), linear decrease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
3
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
4
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…We recorded 12 study-related, Grade 1–2 AEs and no serious AEs. In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
Demographics of the study population.
Published 2024“…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
-
9
Table 3 -
Published 2024“…In the comparison among the ipsilateral, contralateral side of iPD with clinical laterality, and disease control group, the OBH of the disease control group was significantly larger than both the ipsilateral and contralateral sides (<i>P</i> < 0.05). …”
-
10
-
11
Data Sheet 1_Exploring long COVID in pediatric patients: clinical insights from a long COVID clinic.docx
Published 2025“…</p>Methods<p>We conducted a retrospective study of patients aged 0–21 years evaluated at the Long COVID Clinic at Children's Hospital Los Angeles between August 2021 and November 2023. …”
-
12
Data extracted from the included studies.
Published 2024“…Three studies reported an increase in the proportion of patients admitted after introducing an ADP, one of which was significant while 15 studies reported a significant decrease in admission proportion. …”
-
13
Risk of bias assessments for controlled trials.
Published 2024“…Three studies reported an increase in the proportion of patients admitted after introducing an ADP, one of which was significant while 15 studies reported a significant decrease in admission proportion. …”
-
14
-
15
Characteristics of the study participants.
Published 2025“…A significant time effect was also observed for PPT, with an increase in the right-side threshold (p = 0.0186; d = 0.58). …”
-
16
Presentation 1_A phase 2a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of NuGel, a novel topical GPCR19-mediated inflammasome inhi...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>NuGel (0.3% [Nu0.3] and 0.5% [Nu0.5]) was well-tolerated, with no adverse drug reactions or serious adverse events. Nu0.3 showed a significant decrease in EASI score from baseline (-12.2%, [-30.3%, 5.9%], p = 0.04). …”
-
17
Presentation 3_A phase 2a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of NuGel, a novel topical GPCR19-mediated inflammasome inhi...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>NuGel (0.3% [Nu0.3] and 0.5% [Nu0.5]) was well-tolerated, with no adverse drug reactions or serious adverse events. Nu0.3 showed a significant decrease in EASI score from baseline (-12.2%, [-30.3%, 5.9%], p = 0.04). …”
-
18
Data Sheet 1_A phase 2a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of NuGel, a novel topical GPCR19-mediated inflammasome inhibi...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>NuGel (0.3% [Nu0.3] and 0.5% [Nu0.5]) was well-tolerated, with no adverse drug reactions or serious adverse events. Nu0.3 showed a significant decrease in EASI score from baseline (-12.2%, [-30.3%, 5.9%], p = 0.04). …”
-
19
Data Sheet 2_A phase 2a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of NuGel, a novel topical GPCR19-mediated inflammasome inhibi...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>NuGel (0.3% [Nu0.3] and 0.5% [Nu0.5]) was well-tolerated, with no adverse drug reactions or serious adverse events. Nu0.3 showed a significant decrease in EASI score from baseline (-12.2%, [-30.3%, 5.9%], p = 0.04). …”
-
20
Presentation 2_A phase 2a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of NuGel, a novel topical GPCR19-mediated inflammasome inhi...
Published 2025“…</p>Results<p>NuGel (0.3% [Nu0.3] and 0.5% [Nu0.5]) was well-tolerated, with no adverse drug reactions or serious adverse events. Nu0.3 showed a significant decrease in EASI score from baseline (-12.2%, [-30.3%, 5.9%], p = 0.04). …”