Search alternatives:
significant deviation » significant variation (Expand Search), significant elevation (Expand Search), significant variations (Expand Search)
deviation models » mediation models (Expand Search), mediation model (Expand Search), detection models (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
significant deviation » significant variation (Expand Search), significant elevation (Expand Search), significant variations (Expand Search)
deviation models » mediation models (Expand Search), mediation model (Expand Search), detection models (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
Spike prediction coherence and NST standard deviation as a function of size of recent event history.
Published 2023Subjects: -
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
The carotid canal area is larger on the unaffected side than on the affected side in patients with unilateral moyamoya disease, but the difference decreases according to the contra...
Published 2021“…<p>(A) shows the carotid canal area compared between the affected side and the unaffected side in patients with unilateral moyamoya disease, and the unaffected side is significantly wider than the affected side (p = 0.018). …”
-
11
-
12
-
13
The slope for all significant factors on the number of steps before a fall across all three speeds.
Published 2022Subjects: -
14
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
-
15
General linear mixed model coefficients and significance for species-specific ungulate intensity of use as a function of cattle grazing period.
Published 2024“…<p>Summary table of general linear mixed model describing the weekly intensity of use for each native ungulate species (where elk is the reference category and WT deer is white-tailed deer) and grazing period (where ‘before’ cattle grazing is the reference category), parameter estimates, their standard error (SE) and significance are given. …”
-
16
-
17
-
18
-
19
-
20