Search alternatives:
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant ns » significant bins (Expand Search), significant non (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant ns » significant bins (Expand Search), significant non (Expand Search), significant new (Expand Search)
ns decrease » nn decrease (Expand Search), _ decrease (Expand Search), we decrease (Expand Search)
a decrease » _ decrease (Expand Search), _ decreased (Expand Search), _ decreases (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
Rescue of <i>pbp1</i>-KD phenotypes using CRISPRi trans-complementation.
Published 2025“…The mean and standard deviation were calculated across replicates; statistical significance was determined by a one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparisons test. ns, not significant; **** p < 0.0001.…”
-
5
Propofol wash-in.
Published 2025“…(i) There was no difference in the change in the post-burst area between any of the concentrations of propofol used following 5 minutes of wash-in (MWU test; 0 μM: n = 10; 3 μM: n = 8; 10 μM: n = 10). (ii) A significantly larger decrease in post-burst spikes was observed after wash-in of both 3 μM and 10 μM propofol compared to the control (0 μM). …”
-
6
Ketamine wash-in.
Published 2025“…(ii) The change in post-burst spiking after the wash-in of 20 μM and 100 μM was not significant compared to the control (MWU test). However, the decrease in post-burst spiking was significantly larger after the wash-in of 100 μM ketamine than with 20 μM (MWU test). …”
-
7
Visual surround network activation modulates center excitability in the SCs.
Published 2025“…Statistical testing was done using <i>t</i> test followed by Wilcoxon rank-signed test (** <i>p</i> < 0.01, *** <i>p</i> < 0.001; ns, no significance). The data underlying this figure can be found in the Supplementary section.…”