Association between dietary niacin intake and COPD odds ratio. by Yushan Shi (16440272)

Subjects:

Quantile regression results of female triathletes. by Junhui Zhao (626062)

Subjects:

Descriptive statistics for numerical variables. by Junhui Zhao (626062)

Subjects:

Videofluoroscopic swallowing study parameters. by Rie Asayama (693361)

Subjects:

Flow diagram of study participants. by Yushan Shi (16440272)

Subjects:

Interventions for Psychological Stress in Pregnant African American Women: A Scoping Review by Taleah A. Frazier (22423294)

Subjects:

Setting up for VFSS image. by Rie Asayama (693361)

Subjects:

Picosecond Lifetimes of Hydrogen Bonds in the Halide Perovskite CH₃NH₃PbBr₃ by Alejandro Garrote-Márquez (16796896)

Subjects:

Improved Accuracy and Reliability in Untargeted Analysis with LC-ESI-QTOF/MS¹ by Ensemble Averaging by Guillaume Laurent Erny (21000926)

Subjects:

Improved Accuracy and Reliability in Untargeted Analysis with LC-ESI-QTOF/MS¹ by Ensemble Averaging by Guillaume Laurent Erny (21000926)

Subjects:

Statins induced flatter neuronal somas. by Shuk C. Tsoi (21192243)

Top 10 significant functional annotations of up-regulated DEGs. by Meitner Cadena (22216261)

“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance according to the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”

Top 10 significant functional annotations of down-regulated DEGs. by Meitner Cadena (22216261)

“…Functional annotations are ordered by decreasing significance, with color indicating significance level based on the legend’s color scale, the ratio of genes on the horizontal axis, and DEG count represented by circle size.…”

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for ether extract intake (g/d) as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (WM) or milk replacer (MR) to newborn Holstein cal... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for body measurements as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (WM) or milk replacer (MR) to newborn Holstein calves (n =... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for eating time (min/8-h) and sorting index (%) on sieve 2.36 mm and bottom pan as influenced by feeding pasteurized waste milk (... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Interaction panel of Treat × Period effect (T × P) for starter intake (g/d), body weight (kg), average daily gain (g/d), and feed efficiency (g/g) as influenced by feeding pasteuri... by Shahryar Kargar (18880600)

Major hyperparameters of RF-SVR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Pseudo code for coupling model execution process. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”

Major hyperparameters of RF-MLPR. by Jintao Li (448681)

“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R² value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”