Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
greater decrease » greatest decrease (Expand Search), greater increase (Expand Search), greater disease (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
4141
Results of RF algorithm screening factors.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
4142
Schematic diagram of the basic principles of SVR.
Published 2024“…For instance, the RF-MLPR model achieved a 3.7%–6.5% improvement in the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) metric across four hydrological stations compared to the RF-SVR model. (4) Prediction accuracy decreased with longer forecast periods, with the R<sup>2</sup> value dropping from 0.8886 for a 1-month forecast to 0.6358 for a 12-month forecast, indicating the increasing challenge of long-term predictions due to greater uncertainty and the accumulation of influencing factors over time. (5) The RF-MLPR model outperformed the RF-SVR model, demonstrating a superior ability to capture the complex, nonlinear relationships inherent in the data. …”
-
4143
Comparison of the cohesion ranges of different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4144
-
4145
-
4146
-
4147
Stack column chart represent Emotional Exhaustion through demographic structure.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4148
-
4149
-
4150
Comparison of adhesiveness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4151
-
4152
-
4153
-
4154
-
4155
-
4156
Stack column chart represent Depersonalization through demographic structure.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4157
-
4158
Statistical analysis of adhesiveness, hardness, and cohesiveness across IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4159
Comparison of hardness ranges for different food categories under IDDSI levels.
Published 2025Subjects: -
4160
Stack column chart represent Personal Accomplishment through demographic structure.
Published 2025Subjects: