Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
linear decrease » linear increase (Expand Search)
-
3081
-
3082
Data.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
3083
Genomic downregulation of TGF β1 production in monocytes obtained after RZV administration. Panel A. The heatmap shows 16 genes on the y axis whose accessibility significantly changed between Days 0 and 90 after vaccination (FDR p < 0.1) in 8 participants shown on the x axis. Note decreased accessibility of the <i>TGFβ1</i> gene. Panel B....
Published 2025“…Note decreased accessibility of the <i>TGFβ1</i> gene. Panel B. …”
-
3084
-
3085
-
3086
Seed germination kinetics of M. stenopetala under the effect of different PEG concentrations.
Published 2025Subjects: -
3087
-
3088
-
3089
-
3090
-
3091
-
3092
Baseline characteristics of patients.
Published 2025“…Participants in the progression group were younger (60.7 vs. 65.7 years, P = 0.015) and showed a larger BCVA change (0.20 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001) and greater ERM area decrease (34.2% vs. 11.7%, P < 0.001) during the follow-up period. …”
-
3093
-
3094
Changes in best-corrected visual acuity and total area reduction ratio of the epiretinal membrane (ERM) during follow-up.
Published 2025“…<p>(a) During the follow-up period, the stable group showed no significant change in visual acuity, whereas the progression group exhibited a decrease compared to baseline starting at 12 months, with greater changes than those in the stable group beginning at 6 months. …”
-
3095
-
3096
Normalized significant family changes in abundance.
Published 2025“…<p>A) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with CCE treatment; B) <i>Bacteroidales_unclassified</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; C) <i>Desulfovibrionaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; D) <i>Rikenellaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; E) <i>Coriobacteriaceae</i> significantly decreased with CCE treatment; F) <i>Erysipelotrichaceae</i> significantly increased with TRE treatment.…”
-
3097
-
3098
-
3099
-
3100