Search alternatives:
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
significant bias » significant based (Expand Search), significant gap (Expand Search), significant degs (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
bias decrease » sizes decrease (Expand Search), bias increases (Expand Search), a decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Risk of bias summary.
Published 2025“…The observed decrease in body weight could be partially attributed to factors influencing energy balance, as evidenced by the significantly lower mean calorie intake at the end of the intervention (1694.71 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1498.57–1890.85) compared to the baseline intake (2000.64 kcal/day, 95% CI: 1830–2172.98), despite the absence of intentional efforts to restrict energy intake by the participants. …”
-
6
-
7
-
8
Version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized controlled trials.
Published 2025Subjects: -
9
-
10
Average stability values (mean ± standard deviation) and statistical results.
Published 2024Subjects: -
11
-
12
-
13
-
14
-
15
-
16
Socio-demographic characteristics of women in study sample (means except as noted).
Published 2025Subjects: -
17
-
18
-
19
-
20