Search alternatives:
significant changes » significant challenge (Expand Search)
changes decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
significant changes » significant challenge (Expand Search)
changes decrease » largest decrease (Expand Search), change increases (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Change in rectal temperature following pre-medication, induction and inhalant anesthesia.
Published 2025“…Overall, when all time points and warming treatments were combined, ACE had significantly larger decreases in body temperature versus DEX, mainly attributable to significant differences at >T30 minutes (both P < 0.05). …”
-
7
-
8
-
9
-
10
-
11
-
12
Fluctuation trend of the mean temperature index.
Published 2025“…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
-
13
Variation curve of the mean temperature index.
Published 2025“…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
-
14
Mann-Kendall test for the mean temperature index.
Published 2025“…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”
-
15
Study-related adverse events.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
16
Study flow chart.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
17
Study CONSORT diagram.
Published 2025“…In a linear mixed model analysis (LMM), the MBSR + PAP arm evidenced a significantly larger decrease in QIDS-SR-16 score than the MBSR-only arm from baseline to 2-weeks post-intervention (between-groups effect = 4.6, 95% CI [1.51, 7.70]; <i>p</i> = 0.008). …”
-
18
-
19
-
20
The Date.
Published 2025“…Secondly, the daily minimum and maximum temperatures increased significantly, which were 0.395°C/10a and 0.200°C/10a respectively<b>—</b>less than the national mean. …”