Showing 21 - 40 results of 32,491 for search '(( significantly ((larger decrease) OR (mean decrease)) ) OR ( significant decrease reveal ))', query time: 1.69s Refine Results
  1. 21
  2. 22
  3. 23
  4. 24

    B2 decreases glycolytic intermediates in cells. by Craig Eyster (392633)

    Published 2025
    “…Other abbreviations: HGA, DL-hydroxyglutaric acid; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvic acid; 3-PGA, 3-phosphoglyceric acid; G3P; glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate; Data (n = 5) are shown as mean±SD. Not significant (ns): **<i>P</i> ≤ 0.01, ****<i>P</i> ≤ 0.0001by one-way ANOVA with multiple comparison of the mean of each test group to the mean of the vehicle control. …”
  5. 25
  6. 26
  7. 27
  8. 28
  9. 29

    ECoG timescales decrease during spatial attention. by Isabel Raposo (21615517)

    Published 2025
    “…Bottom: timescales significantly decrease during covert attention relative to the attend-out condition (two locations: <i>p</i> = 0.0244; four locations: <i>p</i> < 0.0001; mean ± SEM; whiskers indicate maximum and minimum; dots correspond to individual electrodes). …”
  10. 30
  11. 31
  12. 32
  13. 33

    Table_1_Decreased Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Concentrations 72 Hours Following Marathon Running.DOCX by Astrid Roeh (11136600)

    Published 2021
    “…Values decreased significantly with the lowest values at 72 h after the marathon compared to baseline (p = 0.025), a finding that was more pronounced in the larger male cohort.…”
  14. 34
  15. 35
  16. 36
  17. 37
  18. 38
  19. 39

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  20. 40