Search alternatives:
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
increase decrease » increased release (Expand Search), increased crash (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
-
5721
-
5722
-
5723
-
5724
Scheme of the test section.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5725
Effects on cooling air mass flow rate.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5726
3D model and section view of E3 NGV.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5727
Conditions for uncertainty analyses.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5728
Scheme for mesh convergence study.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5729
Main test parameters.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5730
3-D printed NGV specimen.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5731
Relative error bar of surface temperature.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5732
Effect on the NGV leading edge temperature.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5733
Schematic of the test equipment.
Published 2025“…The results reveal that the large deviation in the manufactured vane (up to 0.5 mm at the leading edge) alters the direction of the coolant flowing out from the leading-edge film-cooling holes, affects the film coverage along the surface, and in consequence, causes the temperature near the stagnation point increasing by approximately 40 K. Furthermore, variations in coolant inlet pressure, decreasing by 10 kPa, and temperature, increasing by 10 K, result in the vane surface temperature increased by 20 ~ 30 K. …”
-
5734
-
5735
-
5736
S1 Dataset -
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The mean HbA1c level decreased from 8.61 ± 1.70 to 7.92 ± 1.60 after implementing the WhatsApp group instructions; the values showed a significant difference (t-value = 5.107 and <i>P</i>-value < 0.001). …”
-
5737
Particepant recruitment flowchart.
Published 2024“…</p><p>Results</p><p>The mean HbA1c level decreased from 8.61 ± 1.70 to 7.92 ± 1.60 after implementing the WhatsApp group instructions; the values showed a significant difference (t-value = 5.107 and <i>P</i>-value < 0.001). …”
-
5738
-
5739
-
5740
Results of SD-TOPSIS application ‐ combination A.
Published 2024“…Based on the performed analyses, we can see that significant differences result from their reduction. …”