Showing 201 - 220 results of 66,836 for search '(( significantly ((larger decrease) OR (nn decrease)) ) OR ( significant clinical disease ))*', query time: 0.72s Refine Results
  1. 201
  2. 202
  3. 203
  4. 204
  5. 205

    Data Sheet 1_Deep learning analysis of exercise stress electrocardiography for identification of significant coronary artery disease.docx by Hsin-Yueh Liang (20887901)

    Published 2025
    “…The mean age was 57.0 ± 10.1 years, and 614 (75%) were male patients. Significant coronary artery disease was seen in 369 (43.8%) CAG reports. …”
  6. 206

    Correlation between orexin levels and clinical characteristics in patients with Parkinson’s disease. by Takuya Ogawa (385601)

    Published 2022
    “…All these clinical characteristics showed poor correlation with CSF orexin levels, and the correlation coefficients were not statistically significant. …”
  7. 207
  8. 208
  9. 209
  10. 210
  11. 211
  12. 212

    Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension and severe portal hypertension in chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis by Yayang Duan (14854089)

    Published 2023
    “…<p>Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has been proposed for detecting clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) and severe portal hypertension (SPH) in patients with chronic liver diseases (CLD).…”
  13. 213
  14. 214

    Temporal profiles of the key BO-NN features. by Julia Berezutskaya (9080269)

    Published 2020
    “…The shifts associated with non-significant prediction accuracies are greyed-out. <b>(c)</b> The results of the MDS for the key BO-NN features. …”
  15. 215
  16. 216

    Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice. by Udaysankar Chockanathan (18510288)

    Published 2024
    “…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”
  17. 217
  18. 218
  19. 219
  20. 220