Search alternatives:
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
decrease reveal » decreased level (Expand Search), decreased levels (Expand Search), decreased sexual (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
significant decrease » significant increase (Expand Search), significantly increased (Expand Search)
larger decrease » marked decrease (Expand Search)
decrease reveal » decreased level (Expand Search), decreased levels (Expand Search), decreased sexual (Expand Search)
teer decrease » mean decrease (Expand Search), greater decrease (Expand Search)
-
61
Table_1_Decreased Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor Concentrations 72 Hours Following Marathon Running.DOCX
Published 2021“…Values decreased significantly with the lowest values at 72 h after the marathon compared to baseline (p = 0.025), a finding that was more pronounced in the larger male cohort.…”
-
62
-
63
-
64
-
65
-
66
-
67
-
68
-
69
-
70
The effect of HA digestion and HA replenishment alone or with CS on barrier function measured by TEER.
Published 2025“…PS decreased TEER. (C) Different treatments (treatment groups n = 8)with HA and/or CS did not affect TEER recovery after PS treatment, full recovery was seen in all groups after 24 hours. …”
-
71
-
72
-
73
-
74
-
75
-
76
-
77
-
78
-
79
-
80
Spatial information is significantly decreased in dCA1 and vCA1 in APP/PS1 mice.
Published 2024“…The spatial information in dCA1 was significantly larger than circularly shuffled spike trains with similar mean firing rates for C57BL/6 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.132 ± 0.048, shuffled = 0.124 ± 0.035, p < 0.001, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 305 units from 5 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 30500 simulated units from 5 recording sessions), but not for APP/PS1 mice (mean ± std: empirical = 0.128 ± 0.051, shuffled = 0.123 ± .047, p = 0.39, two-sided Wilcoxon rank-sum test, n<sub>empirical</sub> = 180 units from 4 recording sessions, n<sub>shuffled</sub> = 18000 simulated units from 4 recording sessions). …”